The Hague Convention – Warnings over parental child abduction treaty

July 22, 2012

Source: BBC

An international treaty designed to ensure the swift return of children abducted abroad by a parent needs to be implemented faster, researchers say. A study suggests the proportion of returns under the Hague Convention on child abduction fell between 2003 and 2008 and that cases took longer.

Cardiff University Professor Nigel Lowe says his study sends “warning signs” about the treaty’s overall performance. The body overseeing the treaty says it relies on members to operate it well.

The Cardiff study compared figures from 2008 with those from five years earlier and found there was a 45% increase in the number of applications to get children back, that the proportion of returns had declined and cases took longer to resolve.

“I’m particularly concerned with the time which I think is the essence of Hague cases,” said Professor Lowe, describing himself as a “big fan” of the convention. “The finding that they are taking longer to be dealt with for me is a worrying one and one that I wish to see addressed.”

Constitutional vs. International lawThe Hague Convention requires an abducted child to be sent back quickly to where they usually live, which is viewed as the best country to decide on matters such as custody and access.

Continue reading the main storyAbduction: what to do

  • Seek advice from a family lawyer and request an order stopping the child from being removed from the country
  • Contact the police if the abduction is expected to take place within the next 48 hours
  • Keep the child’s passport in a safe place
  • Call the Foreign Office’s Child Abduction Section on 020 7008 0878

Source: FCO

A judgement on whether or not to return a child should ideally be reached within six weeks of court proceedings starting.

There are some exemptions – for example where there’s a “grave risk” that a child would be exposed to “physical or psychological harm”. Yet cases can take years to resolve with some never resolved at all.

One man who’s been trying to get his daughter returned from Mexico for almost two and a half years told Radio 4’s Face the Facts an “amparo” had held things up. It is a part of Mexican law that recognises a citizen’s constitutional human rights.

“They told me they are going to hear this amparo in July last year, then they said they are going to push it back to August, then September. So until they decide about the amparo then nothing happens,” the man said.

Mexico is a fellow signatory to the Hague Convention with the UK. Its Deputy Ambassador in London, Alejandro Estivil, said its supreme court had clearly resolved that constitutional law took precedence over international matters but insisted the country took its obligations seriously.

“I can guarantee that Mexican authorities are trying in every case to comply with the Hague Convention and be as swift as possible,” he said.

Consensus-based process”I think one has to acknowledge that the convention is not perfect and it isn’t implemented perfectly everywhere”, said Professor Louise Ellen Teitz, First Secretary of the Hague Conference on Private International Law and who is responsible for the treaty. “There are more cases and fewer resources.”

Continue reading the main story“Start Quote

If we go pussyfooting like this all the time, nothing is ever going to change. We need to be much more firm”

Lady Catherine MeyerParents and Abducted Children Together

Professor Teitz said the convention relied on its members to operate it well. There are around 200 legal jurisdictions in the world. Only 87 of them are signatories to the Hague Convention, with no penalties for those that do not follow the rules. The process depends on international diplomacy to encourage poorly performing countries to improve.

“We are very careful never to name names or to seek to criticise or stigmatise”, said Lord Justice Thorpe, the head of international family justice for England and Wales.

“The whole process depends on consensus so you hope always that you can uplift some country that’s not performing so well, by either example or by direct aid.”

But Lady Catherine Meyer – whose two sons were detained overseas by her ex-husband 10 years ago and who now runs the charity Parents and Abducted Children Together – said the time for diplomacy alone was over.

She said she would like to see countries named and shamed and thrown out of the convention if they do not stick to it. “If we go pussyfooting like this all the time, nothing is ever going to change. We need to be much more firm.

“The Hague Convention is better than nothing but it is absolutely not fool proof and some countries do not abide by it the way they should.”

You can listen Face the Facts: The Stolen Families on BBC Radio 4 at 21:00 BST on Sunday 22 July and on BBC iPlayer.

More on This Story

Related Stories

Follow our updates on Twitter and Facebook

Testimonials from our clients


profile pic.jpgdroppedImage_7TM

download (2)

ABP World Group™ Risk Management

Contact us here: Mail 

Skype: abpworld

NOTE: We are always available 24/7

2 thoughts on “The Hague Convention – Warnings over parental child abduction treaty

  1. I’m LBP whose son has been abducted to Poland from Canada and the Hague Convention for me and many other LBP is not working. Country like Poland using the Hague Convention to legalize abduction and kidnapping of children. The swift return abducted child is only on the paper. The Hague Convention is only false hope for LBP

  2. So true. And I am one of the dumb ones. Foolish enough to believe that agreeing to international visitation was going to be ok. All the citizenship, paperwork, court orders and residency seem to mean nothing. These other countries simply ignore the US and our courts. Does any one else find it odd that we can’t hold the hague hearing in the country that has venue and jurisdiction? For me and my son, it is Greece…5 months and still waiting for just the ruling. The Hague is outdated and unmonitored. Why they think that they have any right to hold our children? It’s hard to understand in 2012 why we are forced to deal with a system created in 1980. And that seems to protect the taking parent’s rights more than the children and the left behind parents begging for their children’s return. To all parents considering international visitation…..DON”T! You will find out just as we all have, YOUR KIDS WILL HAVE NO PROTECTION ABROAD FROM THEIR COUNTRIES. My son is an American but outside of our borders…he has no protection and his rights as a citizen mean nothing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s